Leeds · England

Your area

Leeds council area. Every figure carries its own date.

Choose a ward to see its people, homes, health and mapped crime. These are electoral neighbourhoods within the council area; some extend beyond the city itself.

Leeds

33 mapped electoral wards · May 2026. The same wards are available in the named list below. These are council boundaries, not police neighbourhoods.

Leeds: 33 wards · boundaries May 2026
Ward	People in census	Privately rented homes	Bad or very bad health
Ardsley & Robin Hood	23,426	13%	4.8%
Armley	26,725	30%	6.6%
Bramley & Stanningley	24,019	17%	6.2%
Burmantofts & Richmond Hill	28,528	29%	6.5%
Calverley & Farsley	24,595	18%	4.3%
Chapel Allerton	24,963	25%	5.7%
Cross Gates & Whinmoor	24,843	12%	5.7%
Gipton & Harehills	30,879	32%	6%
Guiseley & Rawdon	24,628	13%	3.5%
Harewood	18,524	9%	3.4%
Headingley & Hyde Park	31,175	67%	2.6%
Hunslet & Riverside	26,474	50%	5.4%
Killingbeck & Seacroft	26,679	12%	7.6%
Kippax & Methley	22,557	12%	5.5%
Kirkstall	22,234	31%	5.6%
Little London & Woodhouse	31,076	56%	2.7%
Middleton Park	29,605	15%	6.3%
Moortown	23,797	18%	4.5%
Morley North	23,303	15%	4.8%
Morley South	23,990	23%	5%
Pudsey	25,392	16%	5.1%
Rothwell	20,571	12%	5.1%
Roundhay	23,809	18%	4.1%
Weetwood	21,876	23%	4.3%
Wetherby	21,616	11%	4.6%
Horsforth	24,310	14%	3.4%
Otley & Yeadon	22,585	13%	5.3%
Beeston & Holbeck	26,593	36%	5.6%
Farnley & Wortley	25,002	15%	5.8%
Adel & Wharfedale	21,198	10%	3.9%
Alwoodley	23,610	14%	4.6%
Garforth & Swillington	20,882	11%	5.3%
Temple Newsam	22,488	12%	5.1%

Look beneath the council average

Homes rented privately

9.5% to 67.4%

Homes rented privately ranged from 9.5% in Harewood to 67.4% in Headingley & Hyde Park — a gap of 57.9 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 33 of 33 current wards with comparable figures.

A larger private-rented sector changes the mix of housing advice, enforcement and tenant support needed. It does not tell us whether individual homes are affordable or safe.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

Homes rented privately · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Harewood	9.5%	744	7,851
Adel & Wharfedale	9.6%	872	9,042
Garforth & Swillington	11%	984	8,961
Wetherby	11.1%	1,038	9,319
Kippax & Methley	11.6%	1,114	9,598
Killingbeck & Seacroft	11.6%	1,323	11,376
Rothwell	12.2%	1,102	9,029
Cross Gates & Whinmoor	12.2%	1,333	10,893
Temple Newsam	12.3%	1,168	9,464
Guiseley & Rawdon	12.9%	1,359	10,515
Ardsley & Robin Hood	13.1%	1,275	9,741
Otley & Yeadon	13.1%	1,379	10,487
Alwoodley	13.7%	1,366	9,955
Horsforth	14.5%	1,464	10,097
Middleton Park	15%	1,819	12,147
Morley North	15.3%	1,580	10,294
Farnley & Wortley	15.5%	1,714	11,072
Pudsey	16%	1,778	11,093
Bramley & Stanningley	17.1%	1,846	10,810
Roundhay	17.8%	1,672	9,367
Calverley & Farsley	18%	1,888	10,493
Moortown	18.5%	1,838	9,940
Weetwood	22.7%	2,136	9,398
Morley South	23.4%	2,594	11,088
Chapel Allerton	24.8%	2,680	10,817
Burmantofts & Richmond Hill	29.3%	3,627	12,375
Armley	30%	3,544	11,816
Kirkstall	30.8%	3,034	9,846
Gipton & Harehills	32.2%	3,450	10,703
Beeston & Holbeck	35.8%	4,181	11,674
Hunslet & Riverside	50%	5,927	11,865
Little London & Woodhouse	56.1%	5,608	10,000
Headingley & Hyde Park	67.4%	6,962	10,331

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People reporting bad or very bad health

2.6% to 7.6%

People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 2.6% in Headingley & Hyde Park to 7.6% in Killingbeck & Seacroft — a gap of 5 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 33 of 33 current wards with comparable figures.

Residents described their own health. Differences in age matter, so this is a prompt to investigate needs, not a score for local health services.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People reporting bad or very bad health · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Headingley & Hyde Park	2.6%	809	31,175
Little London & Woodhouse	2.7%	847	31,076
Horsforth	3.4%	828	24,310
Harewood	3.4%	634	18,524
Guiseley & Rawdon	3.5%	858	24,628
Adel & Wharfedale	3.9%	820	21,198
Roundhay	4.1%	987	23,809
Weetwood	4.3%	932	21,877
Calverley & Farsley	4.3%	1,060	24,595
Moortown	4.5%	1,069	23,797
Wetherby	4.6%	986	21,616
Alwoodley	4.6%	1,097	23,611
Ardsley & Robin Hood	4.8%	1,128	23,426
Morley North	4.8%	1,130	23,303
Morley South	5%	1,206	23,990
Pudsey	5.1%	1,284	25,392
Temple Newsam	5.1%	1,142	22,490
Rothwell	5.1%	1,056	20,571
Otley & Yeadon	5.3%	1,200	22,587
Garforth & Swillington	5.3%	1,111	20,885
Hunslet & Riverside	5.4%	1,440	26,474
Kippax & Methley	5.5%	1,234	22,557
Beeston & Holbeck	5.6%	1,487	26,593
Kirkstall	5.6%	1,254	22,234
Cross Gates & Whinmoor	5.7%	1,407	24,844
Chapel Allerton	5.7%	1,425	24,960
Farnley & Wortley	5.8%	1,453	25,002
Gipton & Harehills	6%	1,851	30,879
Bramley & Stanningley	6.2%	1,487	24,019
Middleton Park	6.3%	1,868	29,605
Burmantofts & Richmond Hill	6.5%	1,861	28,528
Armley	6.6%	1,767	26,725
Killingbeck & Seacroft	7.6%	2,025	26,680

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People aged 65 or over

2.9% to 27.7%

People aged 65 or over ranged from 2.9% in Little London & Woodhouse to 27.7% in Wetherby — a gap of 24.8 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 33 of 33 current wards with comparable figures.

Age helps locate demand for accessible homes, transport and support. Being older does not itself mean someone needs care.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People aged 65 or over · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Little London & Woodhouse	2.9%	912	31,076
Headingley & Hyde Park	4.3%	1,342	31,177
Hunslet & Riverside	7%	1,862	26,475
Gipton & Harehills	7.4%	2,285	30,881
Burmantofts & Richmond Hill	9.2%	2,638	28,527
Armley	10.9%	2,917	26,725
Beeston & Holbeck	10.9%	2,906	26,591
Kirkstall	11%	2,435	22,232
Chapel Allerton	12%	3,005	24,963
Middleton Park	12.1%	3,580	29,605
Killingbeck & Seacroft	13.2%	3,529	26,682
Bramley & Stanningley	14.6%	3,503	24,019
Farnley & Wortley	16.1%	4,030	25,002
Ardsley & Robin Hood	16.1%	3,776	23,425
Weetwood	16.2%	3,546	21,878
Morley South	16.3%	3,909	23,990
Roundhay	16.7%	3,971	23,809
Moortown	17%	4,038	23,797
Calverley & Farsley	17.4%	4,269	24,595
Pudsey	18.4%	4,676	25,393
Horsforth	18.5%	4,509	24,310
Temple Newsam	19.1%	4,305	22,489
Cross Gates & Whinmoor	19.6%	4,860	24,845
Kippax & Methley	19.7%	4,449	22,557
Morley North	20%	4,663	23,301
Guiseley & Rawdon	20.1%	4,945	24,627
Alwoodley	20.7%	4,898	23,614
Rothwell	21.1%	4,337	20,574
Adel & Wharfedale	23%	4,880	21,198
Garforth & Swillington	24.8%	5,180	20,882
Otley & Yeadon	25%	5,644	22,584
Harewood	26.8%	4,971	18,524
Wetherby	27.7%	5,997	21,616

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People aged 16+ with no qualifications

5% to 32.5%

People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 5% in Headingley & Hyde Park to 32.5% in Gipton & Harehills — a gap of 27.5 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 33 of 33 current wards with comparable figures.

Formal qualifications are only one part of someone's skills. Training decisions also need current vacancies, employment and residents' experience.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People aged 16+ with no qualifications · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Headingley & Hyde Park	5%	1,488	29,503
Little London & Woodhouse	9.1%	2,553	28,175
Horsforth	11.5%	2,234	19,407
Adel & Wharfedale	12%	2,075	17,283
Weetwood	12%	2,190	18,220
Guiseley & Rawdon	12.1%	2,406	19,885
Harewood	12.9%	1,974	15,258
Roundhay	13.1%	2,468	18,806
Moortown	13.6%	2,600	19,153
Alwoodley	14%	2,602	18,628
Calverley & Farsley	15.1%	2,998	19,838
Wetherby	15.4%	2,800	18,163
Kirkstall	16.6%	3,144	18,957
Otley & Yeadon	17.4%	3,263	18,788
Chapel Allerton	17.9%	3,640	20,370
Garforth & Swillington	18.1%	3,140	17,339
Morley South	18.3%	3,597	19,694
Pudsey	18.4%	3,784	20,545
Ardsley & Robin Hood	18.5%	3,486	18,856
Morley North	18.9%	3,627	19,209
Kippax & Methley	19.3%	3,543	18,329
Rothwell	19.8%	3,330	16,827
Temple Newsam	21%	3,798	18,124
Hunslet & Riverside	21.3%	4,528	21,245
Cross Gates & Whinmoor	21.8%	4,331	19,861
Farnley & Wortley	22.8%	4,568	20,066
Bramley & Stanningley	23.4%	4,476	19,156
Armley	24%	5,105	21,285
Beeston & Holbeck	24%	4,986	20,773
Killingbeck & Seacroft	26.8%	5,511	20,570
Middleton Park	27.5%	6,141	22,362
Burmantofts & Richmond Hill	27.7%	6,021	21,708
Gipton & Harehills	32.5%	7,193	22,105

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent

21.9% to 51.8%

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent ranged from 21.9% in Gipton & Harehills to 51.8% in Roundhay — a gap of 30 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 33 of 33 current wards with comparable figures.

Qualifications show local skills, not whether people have secure jobs or use those skills at work.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Gipton & Harehills	21.9%	4,832	22,105
Middleton Park	22.4%	4,998	22,362
Killingbeck & Seacroft	23.9%	4,910	20,570
Farnley & Wortley	24.3%	4,886	20,066
Bramley & Stanningley	25.6%	4,898	19,156
Burmantofts & Richmond Hill	25.7%	5,577	21,708
Cross Gates & Whinmoor	26.9%	5,342	19,861
Kippax & Methley	27.1%	4,962	18,329
Temple Newsam	27.9%	5,050	18,124
Armley	28.1%	5,986	21,285
Ardsley & Robin Hood	28.4%	5,357	18,856
Beeston & Holbeck	28.5%	5,929	20,773
Morley North	29.4%	5,645	19,209
Garforth & Swillington	29.6%	5,125	17,339
Pudsey	30.1%	6,178	20,545
Rothwell	30.1%	5,061	16,827
Morley South	30.9%	6,094	19,694
Headingley & Hyde Park	33.2%	9,798	29,503
Otley & Yeadon	35%	6,571	18,788
Little London & Woodhouse	36.7%	10,349	28,175
Calverley & Farsley	39.7%	7,876	19,838
Hunslet & Riverside	40.4%	8,591	21,245
Wetherby	41%	7,438	18,163
Guiseley & Rawdon	41.5%	8,243	19,885
Kirkstall	41.6%	7,886	18,957
Chapel Allerton	43.8%	8,929	20,370
Harewood	45.8%	6,995	15,258
Alwoodley	47.3%	8,816	18,628
Adel & Wharfedale	47.9%	8,286	17,283
Horsforth	48.4%	9,393	19,407
Weetwood	49.6%	9,046	18,220
Moortown	49.9%	9,563	19,153
Roundhay	51.8%	9,748	18,806

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages

9% to 31.3%

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 9% in Harewood to 31.3% in Gipton & Harehills — a gap of 22.2 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 33 of 33 current wards with comparable figures.

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Harewood	9%	710	7,854
Horsforth	10.9%	1,100	10,096
Guiseley & Rawdon	11.2%	1,177	10,512
Adel & Wharfedale	11.7%	1,058	9,041
Wetherby	12.1%	1,126	9,319
Calverley & Farsley	12.7%	1,337	10,496
Roundhay	12.9%	1,210	9,368
Moortown	14.1%	1,402	9,937
Alwoodley	14.8%	1,471	9,957
Weetwood	15.2%	1,425	9,398
Garforth & Swillington	15.5%	1,386	8,961
Ardsley & Robin Hood	15.7%	1,531	9,742
Morley North	16%	1,644	10,295
Otley & Yeadon	16.6%	1,742	10,488
Headingley & Hyde Park	16.7%	1,724	10,332
Kippax & Methley	16.7%	1,603	9,600
Pudsey	16.9%	1,871	11,092
Morley South	17.5%	1,945	11,090
Rothwell	17.6%	1,592	9,032
Temple Newsam	18.3%	1,728	9,464
Little London & Woodhouse	18.4%	1,841	10,000
Chapel Allerton	20%	2,160	10,816
Cross Gates & Whinmoor	20.8%	2,264	10,892
Kirkstall	21.4%	2,103	9,847
Hunslet & Riverside	21.7%	2,579	11,866
Farnley & Wortley	21.9%	2,428	11,069
Beeston & Holbeck	23.7%	2,771	11,675
Bramley & Stanningley	24.2%	2,618	10,811
Armley	25.5%	3,015	11,818
Middleton Park	26.7%	3,249	12,146
Killingbeck & Seacroft	29.4%	3,344	11,375
Burmantofts & Richmond Hill	29.7%	3,674	12,377
Gipton & Harehills	31.3%	3,345	10,704

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →

Homes rented from a council or housing association

5.3% to 43.4%

Homes rented from a council or housing association ranged from 5.3% in Harewood to 43.4% in Burmantofts & Richmond Hill — a gap of 38.1 percentage points.

21 March 2021 · 33 of 33 current wards with comparable figures.

The share of social housing describes the homes already here. It does not show the current waiting list or whether enough suitable homes are available.

See each ward and the workings

These are separate ward percentages, not an average of them. Boundaries: May 2026. Missing or differently defined figures are excluded from this range and stay visible on the ward pages.

Homes rented from a council or housing association · 21 March 2021
Ward	Share	Count	Population or households covered
Harewood	5.3%	417	7,851
Calverley & Farsley	8.1%	853	10,493
Guiseley & Rawdon	8.6%	905	10,515
Adel & Wharfedale	10%	900	9,042
Roundhay	10%	934	9,367
Morley North	10.7%	1,105	10,294
Horsforth	11.1%	1,120	10,097
Garforth & Swillington	11.1%	997	8,961
Ardsley & Robin Hood	11.5%	1,121	9,741
Wetherby	11.6%	1,079	9,319
Moortown	12.9%	1,281	9,940
Kippax & Methley	13%	1,249	9,598
Morley South	13.4%	1,489	11,088
Alwoodley	14.1%	1,399	9,955
Headingley & Hyde Park	15.2%	1,575	10,331
Weetwood	16.1%	1,513	9,398
Rothwell	16.4%	1,485	9,029
Pudsey	17.3%	1,923	11,093
Otley & Yeadon	17.8%	1,869	10,487
Temple Newsam	19.5%	1,850	9,464
Cross Gates & Whinmoor	21%	2,283	10,893
Farnley & Wortley	23.5%	2,600	11,072
Hunslet & Riverside	23.6%	2,797	11,865
Beeston & Holbeck	25%	2,922	11,674
Chapel Allerton	27.3%	2,951	10,817
Kirkstall	28.7%	2,823	9,846
Little London & Woodhouse	30.2%	3,021	10,000
Bramley & Stanningley	30.3%	3,274	10,810
Armley	30.8%	3,635	11,816
Gipton & Harehills	34.6%	3,705	10,703
Middleton Park	36.1%	4,383	12,147
Killingbeck & Seacroft	43.2%	4,909	11,376
Burmantofts & Richmond Hill	43.4%	5,373	12,375

Source and method →

What could respond to this pattern →